AI for EdTech

Accessly by Datics AI · EdTech service

An AI-assisted review of your product against WCAG 2.1 AA, with fixes your team can ship.

We review your key learner and admin flows against WCAG 2.1 AA, explain each issue in plain language and can ship the fixes. Evidence for your own conformance report, not a certification.

An engineering review, not a certification or a legal opinion.

review.northstarcampus.com / course-page / findings

In · Review requested

Check the HIT-210 course page against WCAG 2.1 AA.

Out · Accessly

1.3.1 Info and relationshipsAdd a visible label tied to each field.High
1.4.3 Contrast (minimum)Darken the badge text to meet 4.5:1.High
1.2.2 Captions (prerecorded)Add a caption track and a transcript link.Medium

Same demo, step by step below.

Try it step by step

Illustrative demo on a fictional institution. Not client work.

From page to findings and fixes

Findings pinned to the page, mapped to WCAG, with the fixed version beside them.

Northstar College (fictional). A sample review of the HIT-210 course page at Northstar College.

Course page · Northstar College

Input

HIT-210 · Week 3: Coding systems

Due Fri
▶ Intro video · 4:12

Check your understanding

…
…

A course page in. Findings mapped to WCAG, each with a fix, out.

  1. 1Loading the course page flow
  2. 2Running automated WCAG 2.1 AA checks
  3. 3Engineer review of each result
  4. 4Writing findings and fixes

Illustrative demo on a fictional institution. Not client work.

Where the findings land

Accessly findings, in a workspace your team can act on.

Today: findings sit in a spreadsheet until someone turns them into work.

review.northstarcampus.com / findings

NorthstarDashboardFlowsFindingsFixesReports
FindingsAll findingsBy flowBy criterionFixed

WCAG 2.1 AA findings

4 of 4 records

Export
Search
RefIssueStatus
A11Y-01Quiz inputs have no labelsOpen
A11Y-02Deadline badges below contrastOpen
A11Y-03Intro video has no captionsOpen
A11Y-04Gradebook not keyboard reachableOpen

Copy findings into tickets by hand, one by one.

Illustrative demo on a fictional institution. Not client work.

What it does

What the Accessly review covers.

"In the demo" items are shown above; the others are available on request.

Review the key flows, fix what matters, and keep it fixed on every release.

Review

Flow review

In the demo

Checks key learner and admin flows (sign-in, course page, quiz, gradebook, admin settings) against WCAG 2.1 AA, with findings mapped to criteria.

Fix

Fix plan

In the demo

Groups findings into a backlog with severity and a suggested fix.

Fix

Remediation

In the demo

Our engineers ship the fixes as pull requests.

Why it sells

What Accessly does for your sales.

Best fit: Any vendor selling to public colleges, universities or districts.

Public-sector deals

Public colleges, universities and districts ask for accessibility evidence in procurement; the review gives your team evidence for its own conformance report.

A reason to renew

Fixing the issues your customers' users hit removes a reason to look elsewhere at renewal.

Fixes, not just findings

Our engineers can ship the fixes as pull requests, so findings don't sit in a backlog.

Built for:Learning platforms Also used in:K-12 software

Controls

What Accessly touches, and who approves.

Reviewed in your staging; nothing changes in your product unless your team merges it.

  • Who uses it

    Your product and engineering team, and the accessibility contact your customers' procurement asks for.

  • What it connects to

    Your product's key learner and admin flows, reviewed in staging.

  • What a person approves

    Your team decides what to fix; our engineers can ship the fixes as pull requests.

See all controls and how we handle student data

How to get it

A fixed-scope review, then the fixes.

Two steps to a reviewed and fixed product. Add more only if you want it.

  1. First · Review · fixed scope

    Five key flows, reviewed

    • WCAG 2.1 AA
    • Five flows
    • In staging
    • Sign-in, course, quiz, gradebook, admin
    • Findings in plain language, by severity
    • A suggested fix for each
    1. Step 1Automated checks
    2. Step 2Engineer review
    3. You getFindings, a fix plan and a quote for fixes
    Scope
    Five flows, agreed before we start
    Where
    Your staging, no production access
    Output
    Evidence for your own conformance report
  2. Then · Remediation

    Fixes, done

    • Quoted price
    • Pull requests
    • Your team merges
    • Quoted from the fix plan
    • Shipped as pull requests
    • Evidence for your conformance report
  3. Optional · Add more later

    Only if you want it

    Re-check before releases:

    • Release check

    Add an AI module:

    • Each one quoted on its own
    • Nothing ongoing unless you ask

Already built or tried AI? Get it scored with the AI ScorecardNeed something else? Start with a Planning Sprint

FAQ

Questions about Accessly.

Is this a VPAT or a certification?

No. It's an engineering review that feeds your own accessibility conformance report; not a certification, a VPAT from us or a legal opinion.

What does the review cover?

Five key flows in staging: sign-in, course page, quiz, gradebook and admin settings. Course content such as PDFs, captions and alt text can be reviewed too.

Who fixes the issues?

Your team decides what to fix. Our engineers can ship the fixes as pull requests, quoted separately.

Can it catch regressions later?

Yes. The release check can run the automated checks on every release and flag regressions.

What does the review cost?

It's scoped and priced before we start, for the five flows; remediation is quoted separately.

See Accessly on your own product.

Bring your product and the flows your customers' procurement asks about. In 30 minutes we look at what the review would cover and what it would take to fix.

Calls run in US Central time. No generic AI presentation: we discuss your product, users and production constraints.